Ethics and different Culture- Right or Wrong?

For the comparable reason that I wait on peck in the eye while conversing, a communicate of self-assertion and sincerity, is the similar reason that the people of Japan consider chair and regular eye contact a rude gesture that direction defiance or challenge, and they shift their eyes or look down to show respect to a nonher. Our culture enlightened us to act in certain ways and melodic line habits concur to what is considered normal. I argue that honorable and honourable value be determined by iodines culture. Culture dictates what a psyche learns, how one behaves, and their habitual modes of thought and reason. Individuals are subject to forbiddenside influences and each(prenominal) mortal is responsible for making decisions in an ethical-as seen by culture- manner. An rating of what is good enough and bad is related to the ethnical background out of which they arise. The performance a person partakes in is dependant on the beau monde which one belong s. For example: human alienate and cannibalism in the 1500 hundreds was a common practice of the American Indians when Cortez landed in atomic number 34 America. It was considered ethically repulsive and unacceptable to the Spanish. At the same time, the Spanish also had their forms of punishment, burning at the sake, which was equally horrible to the Indians and was considered a great evil. This display of differences is a labeled cultural relativism; the Spanish considered burning at the stake an ethical form of work as did the rest of Western Europe. But when presented in sec America to the Indians, it was rejected as evil. Who is to say that human alienate is any worst or better than burning at the stake?

The Indians have as practically right to topple the Spanish as the Spanish do to criticize the Indians. Interestingly, deterrent example and immoral... The argument is a good one, and has been excellently illustrated and supported by specific examples. A good paper always presents a point that is arguable. The point of this paper is arguable, but the author does not address the argument. What is the alternative way, or what are the alternative ways, of regarding ethical motive and culture? What are the weaknesses of those other methods? This essay could be much strengthened by addressing, for example, religious absolutism. If you want to become a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay